Defunct Games
Gangs of London Reviewed by Cyril Lachel on . I would like nothing more than to tell you that Gangs of London takes The Getaway series in a brand new direction that breathes fresh life into the franchise. But that would be a lie. This game is just as bad as it was on the PlayStation 2. Rating: 30%
  1. 2003
  2. 2004
  3. 2005
  4. 2006
  5. 2007
Gangs of London
«
Gangs of London Gangs of London Gangs of London
  • Review Score:

  • D+
On the PlayStation 2 the Getaway series has always paled in comparison to Rockstar Games' Grand Theft Auto franchise. While the graphics are fine and the carefully crafted city of London is about as realistic as you can get, the games were never on the same level of what Rockstar and their developers were doing. Unfortunately things aren't any different on Sony's PlayStation Portable. While the Gangs of London has a few things going for it, there's no doubt that it plays second fiddle to the year-old Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories.

Gangs of London may not carry the Getaway name, but right from the start it's clear that this game is situated in the same gritty universe. It combines a mix of driving and on-foot missions that tell an interesting story of gangs, violence and, well, more gangs. It has the same awkward controls, depressing atmosphere and mission structures. It's not a bad game when compared to the original Getaway and its sequel, Black Monday. Unfortunately neither of those games were all that good to start out with, and Gangs of London does nothing but compound their problems.

There are five different stories in Gangs of London, one for each of the five gangs (EC2 Crew, Morris Kane Firm, Talwar Brothers, Zakharov Organisation and the Water Dragon Triad) located around the city. The big difference between this game and The Getaway is that instead of controlling one main character you are able to play as a squad of gang members. You can tell each of these criminals where to go and what to do, which is certainly nothing new but the type of play mechanic you rarely see in a handheld game.

One of the biggest problems with Gangs of London is the lack of variety in the missions. You are constantly asked to perform the same kind of task over and over again, and no matter how many times you go and shoot up a building or drive someone around it never ends up being much fun. If you've played any of the Grand Theft Auto series (or any of the clones, including the two previous Getaway titles) then you already know what kind of missions you can expect in Gangs of London, the only difference here is that they aren't as much fun as they have been in the past.

Of all the missions found in Gangs of London, it's the constant on-foot missions that become the most tedious. Most of these missions involve you running through tight corridors and killing dozens of bad guys. Unfortunately every corridor ends up looking the same and the enemies rarely put up much of a fight. These boring missions are only made worse by an unruly camera set-up and a terrible control scheme.

The good news is that most of the missions only take a few minutes to complete. Taking a page out of Liberty City Stories, Gangs of London decides to pack its world with nothing but short and simple tasks that rarely take more than four or five minutes. This is good news for people that are only in it for the story, but if you want to go on deep missions that require you to complete a lot of tasks, then you need to look elsewhere. These missions are also fairly easy, I found myself beating almost all of the tasks on the very first attempt. You can go back through these missions and play them on a higher difficulty setting, but considering how boring they are in the first place I can't imagine anybody wanting to do this.

While the world of Gangs of London has stayed largely unchanged since the original release of The Getaway, there is one thing that is definitely different: the cinema cut-scenes. Instead of watching animated characters bark orders and curse at each other, we see comic book-style panels that do not animate at all. Part of me prefers this new style of cinema, I liked the art and I felt that it gave the game's story a slightly different feel. But these cinemas lack the urgency we felt from other games in this series. I also found the writing to be a little hard to swallow, with characters that used profanity simply for the sake of using it. I'm the last person that would be offended at an abundance of profanity, but it isn't done with any style or wit in Gangs of London.